Objection Handling 2: "No Interest" and "No Need"
Click to load video from YouTube.
In this episode
Episode 15 of Dialing Out and the second part of the mini-series on objection handling. Dominka talks with Franjo Papec, BDR at OB2B, about two very classic objections on the phone: "no need" and "no interest". At first glance they sound the same, but they aren't.
Franjo tells how underselling got him a meeting, how an insolvent company had new investors six months later, and how "we already have that" turned into a conversation about pain points. Plus: micro and macro timing, teamwork and the game "Pitch the objection".
Read time: 14 minutes
We discuss
- Underselling as a door opener on a cold call
- Why you don't give up on these objections
- No need vs. no interest: objection or pretext
- Emotional reaction vs. rational rejection
- Toughen up and digest instead of letting it bounce off
- Long-standing partners: accept it, don't give up
- Tone and wording when you hit an objection
- Micro and macro timing
- Insolvency case: new investors six months later
- The biggest mistake: switching off right away
- Teamwork when the same reason keeps coming back
- No need because of self-built software
- Case studies from the same industry
- Mindset, the gym and your own share of the blame
- Research after the call
- Game time: pitch the objection
- Bottom line: similar, but not the same
Show Notes
Click a timestamp to start the video at that point.
1:18Underselling in cold calling: "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you"
Underselling means deliberately putting yourself below the contact person and acting a bit modest, as Dominka describes it. Franjo tells a story from a call: after a short pitch he said "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you", and the contact asked back: "Why are you giving up so quickly?" That got them talking, and Franjo was able to set up a meeting. For Dominka it was "a classic case of underselling"; she has done it a lot herself.
- Franjo was honest because he had seen on the website that not all of the company's products are current in its industry; it "paid off in the end".
- According to Franjo the tactic works especially well when the other person has a big title or a big ego; but you have to be able to understand the person.
- Played well, it leads easily to good information and to a meeting, says Franjo.
4:52Why you shouldn't give up on "no need" and "no interest"
Because these two objections in particular can lead to good feedback and new partners, says Franjo: many salespeople tend to simply give up when they hear "no need" or "no interest", but "the magic behind it" is that you get further precisely through such objections. Dominka adds that someone who says "no interest" and hangs up has nothing to do in a meeting: "You have to change their mind before that. So, on the phone."
- The episode has three parts: what is behind the objections, how to handle them on the phone, experience and tips, plus a game.
- Dominka wants to dissect and demystify the two very classic objections.
- OB2B is a business development agency for lead generation, lead qualification and lead closing.
7:08"No need" or "no interest": objection or pretext?
"No need" has a reason, says Franjo; at first glance both sound the same, but they aren't. The typical reasons behind "no need": the price doesn't fit, the company already has it, is working on it, or it doesn't fit their company systems or company policy. "So there's an argument for why it doesn't fit." Dominka sums it up: "no need" is really more of an objection, "no interest" more of a pretext, and Franjo agrees.
- Reasons for "no need": price, already in place, in progress, doesn't fit company policy.
- The objection vs. pretext distinction is Dominka's wording; Franjo confirms it.
- At first glance both sound the same; once you draw the line, they aren't.
8:35Emotional reaction or rational rejection?
"No interest" is an emotional reaction according to Franjo, "no need" a rational rejection that gets you into a conversation faster. If someone doesn't like cold calls, Franjo understands "completely" that they get angry and hang up. With "no need", on the other hand, the other side briefly describes why it wouldn't work for them, and that is exactly how you find the pain points, "which in the end is also our job".
- Example of "no interest": someone doesn't like cold calls, gets angry and hangs up.
- "No need" opens a conversation because the other person gives their reasons.
- Those reasons reveal the pain points, and finding them is the job.
9:44How do you react to the no yourself? Toughen up and digest instead of letting it bounce off
Over time you have to toughen up, says Franjo: "Because if you react strongly and emotionally every time, you won't be a good salesperson." He relaxes first so he can place the next question with the right tone and the right words, and picks up the other person's specific words to show: "Okay, I listened to you." Dominka questions the phrase "let it bounce off", because then it's simply gone; Franjo suggests "digest" instead, and that takes practice too.
- Relax first, then place the next question well.
- Repeat the other person's specific words: for Franjo, that is empathy.
- The three steps, half-joking: swallow, digest, spit it out.
12:11Typical "no need" situation: the prospect already has long-standing partners
A typical case: the contact already has long-standing partners doing the same thing and uses that to explain why there's no need right now. Franjo: "Which I accept, but I don't give up." Even if the chance of a meeting is slim, he wants to get a foot in the door; his keyword is persistence. Dominka adds that anyone who does sales for their company or is outsourced for it defends a product they believe in, "otherwise we wouldn't even take the job".
- Long-standing partners are a reasoned "no need", but for Franjo no reason to give up.
- Motivation and will help you actually want to handle an objection and get creative, says Dominka.
- Franjo: if you're "all fired up" about the project, you find good arguments more easily, and in a tight spot at least a way to do some data mining.
14:46Tone and wording: calm, relaxed, a little confused
You always have to adapt to the contact person, says Franjo: with the right tone and the right words, the other person is more likely to open up and talk about problems and bad experiences. With the wrong tone you get nothing. His recommendation: relaxed, calm and "even a bit confused", for example with the question "I couldn't understand your arguments, could you please explain that again in more detail?" That way he gets the right pain points out pretty well.
- Dominka's prompts: voice, speed, word choice, arguments, target group, industry.
- Shouting at the other person is "the worst" thing you can do, says Franjo.
- A confused tone invites the other person to explain their arguments in more detail.
16:12Timing on a micro and a macro level: person, industry, market
Dominka distinguishes two levels. Micro timing means adapting to the person: if they're not in today, you don't call ten times, and if they're in meetings all day, you don't call into the meetings. Macro timing means knowing what's going on in the industry, such as huge trade fairs, a saturated market or a crisis, from the news or from LinkedIn. You still call then, but "with a different sentiment": introduce yourself in a friendly way and call again in six months. Franjo adds that contacts really appreciate it when you show understanding and aren't pushy.
- Micro: know when the contact is reachable and in the office.
- Macro: "We don't live in a capsule"; trade fairs, the news and LinkedIn show how the industry is doing.
- Franjo's sentiment when the timing is bad: get a foot in the door and show who you are and what the company does.
19:04Insolvent, and six months later new investors
Even a rejection because of insolvency can turn into a conversation later. Franjo called a company in the middle of the previous year; the very nice contact said: "Yes, unfortunately we're insolvent. Call us again in six months." Franjo doubted whether that made any sense, called again at the start of the year and got the same contact: "Yes, we've found new investors, and we're ready for new projects." Dominka's comment: timing.
- Franjo has called companies several times without knowing they were insolvent.
- Dominka: you could actually find that out beforehand, but sometimes you forget.
- Franjo made the call-back the contact had offered after six months, even though he had doubts.
19:59The biggest mistake: switching off emotionally right away
The biggest mistake, according to Franjo, is switching off emotionally right away and wanting to end the call as quickly as possible: "Because at that moment you've simply thrown away all the possibilities." Despite the stress, especially when the other person is angry, you have to find the strength to ask the right question. His example: "If you already have it or want to implement it, can you explain in more detail why there's no need?" That shows engagement and respect instead of just accepting the no "flatly like that".
- Dominka asks about giving up too early, overthinking and impatience; Franjo names switching off right away.
- The right question shows engagement for data mining and respect for the other person.
- Franjo wants to understand why there's no need or no interest.
21:21The same reason again and again: teamwork, not a solo effort
If the same reason keeps coming up, Franjo says you need the whole team: the project manager, the partner you work for, the quality manager and your colleagues. He asks them: "Have you had experience in this industry and with this problem? What did you do then?" Then you try other scripts, other wording, another approach or a completely different industry. "Because one person can't do it."
- Trigger: you hear "no need" several times for the same or a similar reason.
- The partner is the client whose project the BDR is calling for.
- Goal: the best possible result for the project, so it can keep going.
22:36"No need, we already have that": the self-built software
A success story didn't do it for Franjo, but a good question did. A contact said right away: "No need, we already have that." Franjo asked: "What exactly do you have?" It was self-built software. When Franjo replied that "our software can do the same thing" and that they have several decades of experience, it went quiet for a moment, and then the contact told the whole story: what annoyed him and what the pain points were. Franjo's conclusion: the right questions, the right timing and the right emotional reaction.
- After "we already have that" comes the question of what exactly they have.
- After Franjo's reply, the contact also told him why the whole company had been annoying him.
- Dominka calls it: "you really caught him out".
24:21Following up with case studies from the same industry
When it becomes clear in the conversation that you can help, Dominka likes to follow up with a case study: "Hey, we somehow managed to change their minds too." Or: we do the same for a client like that. "I find that has always worked," she says. Franjo: it shows professionalism, but it requires the right industry and experience; if you have such a case study, you can easily have deeper conversations and organise better meetings.
- Trigger: you realise in the conversation that you can actually help.
- The prerequisite, according to Franjo: experience in exactly this industry.
- A fitting case study shows professionalism.
25:30Mindset and rituals: taking the frustration to the gym
Franjo takes the frustration to the gym. He knows how frustrating it is to be cut off "twenty times a day", but you must not let what you hear in calls affect you. Dominka pushes back: if you hear that 20 times a day, it's partly your own fault. Franjo admits he exaggerated and adds: "But it's also your fault if you take it to heart."
- Franjo's ritual: take the frustration to the gym and have the best session possible.
- If you hear "no need" 20, 30 times a day, Franjo says, you lose your appetite for the project.
- The goal: let out the anger and frustration so you can do it next time in a better mood and fully fired up.
27:29Research after the call: follow your gut
If Dominka has the feeling that someone didn't tell her everything, she does some research after the call: "Who are these people?" Maybe she missed something. Instead of just calling again tomorrow, she calms down, looks into it and sometimes finds that she did everything right. If she finds something, she sends a follow-up email, calls again after all, or brings new information to the next meeting. Franjo: then watch your tone, depending on how the call ended, and sometimes "follow your gut feeling".
- Not every time, but when you have the feeling there could be something more.
- Possible next steps: an email, another call, new information for the next meeting.
- Sometimes the research also shows that you did everything right.
29:11Game time: pitching "no interest" as a product
In the game "Pitch the objection. Sell the no.", prepared by Kim, Franjo has to sell "no interest" as a product in 30 seconds, with bonus points for buzzwords. His pitch: lots of annoying salespeople call, none of them shows empathy or good research, and with "no interest" you can "just cut them off". It costs nothing, you can say it again and again, and it filters: only those who stay persistent and smart and find other ways get through. "So 'no interest' is not just the best brush-off, but also a filter for the future."
- Dominka plays the customer who said yes to everyone and spent "tens of thousands of euros" on products she doesn't need.
- Franjo: two words you can always use, and they cost nothing.
- For Franjo, "no interest" doesn't mean no, but a way to show other possibilities.
33:48Bottom line: similar, but not the same
"No interest" and "no need" are similar, but not the same, Dominka sums up. Mindset is very important: after a bad call, a ritual helps, along with the question of what you could do better. "Don't take it to heart, but still think about it." And instead of letting it bounce off: digest it.
- A ritual after bad calls: look again at what you could do better.
- Don't let it bounce off, digest it: swallow it and then let it out again.
- The series on objections continues; anyone who has never done cold calling should give it a try, and otherwise just ask.
Key takeaways
- Objection handling for "no need" and "no interest": "no need" has a reason such as price, an existing solution or company policy and is more of an objection; "no interest" is an emotional reaction and more of a pretext.
- Underselling can open doors: Franjo's line "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you" led to a meeting.
- If you take every no emotionally, Franjo says, you won't be a good salesperson: relax first, then ask the next question with the right tone and the other person's own words.
- Don't let rejection bounce off, digest it, and that takes practice.
- A calm, even slightly confused tone, asking them to explain their arguments in more detail, helps get the right pain points out.
- Timing has two levels: micro (when is the person reachable) and macro (trade fairs, market situation, crisis); with bad macro timing, still call, but with a different sentiment.
- Take a "Call us again in six months" seriously: Franjo's insolvent company had new investors by then and was ready for new projects.
- The biggest mistake is switching off emotionally right away; better to ask why there's no need.
- If the same reason keeps coming up, you need the team: project manager, partner, quality manager and colleagues, because one person can't do it alone.
- Let out the frustration, for example at the gym, and don't take rejection to heart; if you feel you weren't told everything, research after the call helps.
Pull quotes
"The magic behind it is that it's precisely through objections like these, through 'no need' and 'no interest', that you can get good feedback and also good potential partners."
"I find it's also always a really honest situation when you maybe put yourself below the contact person and act a bit modest."
"If I'm not pushy, but really human, which is what matters most in the sales industry."
Guest
Franjo Papec — BDR, OB2B
Dominka Babić — COO, OB2B (Host)
FAQ
What's the difference between "no need" and "no interest"?
"No need" has a reason: the price doesn't fit, the company already has it, is working on it, or it doesn't fit company policy. "No interest" is an emotional reaction according to Franjo, for example when someone doesn't like cold calls. Dominka puts it this way: "no need" is more of an objection, "no interest" more of a pretext.
How do you respond to "no need" on a cold call?
Ask instead of giving up. Franjo's example: "If you already have it or want to implement it, can you explain in more detail why there's no need?" When a contact said "No need, we already have that", Franjo asked "What exactly do you have?" and, by way of a piece of self-built software, got into a conversation about the pain points.
What is underselling in cold calling?
Deliberately putting yourself below the contact person and acting a bit modest. After a short pitch Franjo said "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you"; the contact asked "Why are you giving up so quickly?", and it ended in a meeting. According to Franjo it works especially well with people who have a big title or a big ego.
How do you react to "no interest" on the phone?
Stay calm and don't switch off. Franjo relaxes first so he can place the next question with the right tone and the right words, and picks up the other person's own words. A slightly confused tone with "could you please explain that again in more detail?" helps him get the pain points out.
When should you call again after a rejection?
For example after six months, if the timing was bad on the first call. With bad macro timing, such as trade fairs or a market crisis, Dominka still calls in a friendly way and gets back in touch in six months. Franjo called an insolvent company again after six months, as the contact had suggested, and heard: "Yes, we've found new investors, and we're ready for new projects."
What do you do when the same objection keeps coming up in cold calling?
Bring in the team. Franjo asks the project manager, the partner he works for, the quality manager and colleagues whether they've had experience in this industry and with this problem. Then you try other scripts, other wording, another approach or another industry, "because one person can't do it".
How do you handle lots of rejections a day as a BDR?
Let the frustration out without taking it to heart. Franjo takes it to the gym so he can call again next time in a better mood. Dominka says that if you hear "no need" 20 times a day, it's partly your own fault, and she does some research after calls where she feels she wasn't told everything.
Transcript4,655 words · approx. 21 min readShowHide
Translated from German. The episode was recorded in German.
1:18Underselling in cold calling: "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you"
1:18Dominka: Action. Hi Franjo, a warm welcome to our fourteenth show. No, to our fifteenth episode. A warm welcome to the 15th episode of our podcast Dialing Out, the OB2B Podcast, and to our second episode on the topic of objections. Are you ready?
1:45Franjo: Always ready, actually, for objections.
1:46Dominka: Okay. A warm welcome, Franjo. You've been a guest here before. I won't introduce you separately again, but you're welcome to do it yourself. Has anything exciting happened in your business development life since the last episode that you might like to share with us?
2:04Franjo: No, but I have a scene that I'd like to discuss later, because it was an objection handling. And I can also tell it briefly now.
Dominka: The stage is yours, go ahead.
Franjo: Thank you. So. What happened?
2:20Dominka: And cut. Just kidding, carry on. You wanted to tell a story, right? An objection again.
Franjo: Exactly.
2:31Franjo: Yes, and the situation was the following: I spoke with a contact person and told him very briefly what the topic was, what we do. So a short pitch. And then I also said: "I understand if this isn't the most interesting thing for you." I started with that right away. And he said to me: "Why are you giving up so quickly?" Then we got into a conversation.
2:56Dominka: That was a classic case of underselling. Very good.
3:01Franjo: Thank you. Of course that's how we got into a conversation, because I said: "Yes, but I'm just being realistic here. I completely understand whether you have such needs or not." And that's how I was also able to set up a meeting.
3:19Dominka: You sly fox. Very good, I like that. That's something I've done a lot too, and I find it's also always a really honest situation when you maybe put yourself below the contact person and act a bit modest.
3:35Franjo: Yes, it's a good tactic. Especially when you see that the other person has, let's say, a big title or a big ego. You really have to be able to understand the other person. And if you can play that well, you can very easily get to the right, to good information and then also, which is what we do, set up a meeting.
3:59Dominka: And you told him straight away that he might not be interested?
4:03Franjo: Because I'd seen on the website that some of the products …
Dominka: That it says "No interest" there?
Franjo: No, no.
Dominka: It wasn't that obvious?
4:12Franjo: No, not that obvious. But I was aware that some things there were okay, in line with the industry, and then some things that are, let's say, not so current in the industry. And I already thought: Okay, if I get into a conversation with them now, it could go well, or it depends. That's why I preferred to be honest in that situation, which paid off in the end. The meeting will still take place at some point in the future, I think.
4:43Dominka: Keyword "no interest". That's the topic today, too.
Franjo: No need and no interest.
Dominka: That's the topic today.
Franjo: Right.
4:52Why you shouldn't give up on "no need" and "no interest"
4:52Dominka: Very briefly, an introduction once more: We are a business development agency that deals with lead generation, lead qualification and lead closing, I can put it that way too. Today we're back on the topic of objection handling, and we've brought in two very classic objections that we'd like to dissect a bit, describe in more detail and demystify. Nice word, demystify.
5:22Franjo: Because when you hear "no need" or "no interest", some people, some salespeople, tend to just give up, so to speak. But the beautiful thing behind it, the magic behind it is that it's precisely through objections like these, through "no need" and "no interest", that you can get good feedback and also good potential partners. Hence: demystify.
5:52Dominka: That's what we're doing today, and here's how: I've been given a plan here, and it's not bad.
Franjo: That's a crib sheet.
6:02Dominka: A little crib sheet, I need it so the whole thing doesn't take three hours, because the two of us could manage that.
Franjo: No problem.
6:10Dominka: So. No need: meaning and interpretation. No interest: distinction and causes. That's the first segment. We'll put the whole thing into context to understand it better: What's actually behind these objections? Second segment: the right way to deal with these objections, strategies and techniques on the phone.
Franjo: Good.
6:33Dominka: Or in the meeting too, if you … But actually someone who said "no interest" straight away and hung up, or who somehow won't be talked round, has no business being in a meeting, right? You have to change their mind before that. So, on the phone.
Franjo: Exactly, exactly.
6:52Dominka: And then a bit of experience and tips, but we'll manage all that. There's also a game again, a bit of game time, and then we'll say goodbye to our dear viewers and listeners. So.
7:08"No need" or "no interest": objection or pretext?
7:08Franjo: First segment, right?
Dominka: The first segment is: no need, meaning and interpretation.
7:15Franjo: Good. I've thought about this a lot. I have a lot of free time, which is also good. So. The question I asked myself was: What's the difference between "no need" and "no interest"? At first glance it sounds the same. You're saying the same principle, but it's not really the same once you draw the line a bit.
7:45Franjo: I'd say that "no need" has a reason. Either the price doesn't fit, they already have it, they're working on it, or something like that doesn't fit, let's say, into their company systems or their company policy. So there's an argument for why it doesn't fit.
8:10Dominka: So you'd say that "no need" is really more of an objection and "no interest" more of a pretext?
Franjo: Exactly. You put that nicely.
8:19Dominka: Well, I've been in this job for a long time, too.
Franjo: Yes, that's why I've been able to learn a lot from you.
Dominka: From you too.
Franjo: Oh no.
Dominka: Thank you at this point. Thanks. Keep going.
8:35Emotional reaction or rational rejection?
8:35Dominka: What I find very exciting is the distinction between the emotional reaction and the rational rejection. Where does the emotional reaction lie, and what is a rational rejection with these objections or pretexts?
8:57Franjo: With "no interest" you can really hear that it's an emotional reaction. If, for example, the person doesn't like cold calls and I call him, then I completely understand that he's angry, just hangs up and says: "Please don't call me again." I completely understand that. With "no need" you can get into a conversation faster, where the other side can also briefly describe why the whole thing wouldn't work for them, or might. But precisely because of that, you can find out the pain points through the conversation, which in the end is also our job, isn't it?
9:44How do you react to the no yourself? Toughen up and digest instead of letting it bounce off
9:44Dominka: And maybe from the side of the person who receives the "no interest" or "no need" as an objection or pretext: How am I allowed to react to it emotionally, or how can you react to it emotionally? At the beginning, when you hear it for the first time, it's probably strong. It hits you. But over time?
10:10Franjo: Over time you have to toughen up against it. Because if you react strongly and emotionally every time, you won't be a good salesperson. You have to be able to think rationally and also function well in stressful situations like that, so that you can ask good questions afterwards, which is also a way to resolve the whole thing. So my reaction would be the following: When I hear "no need" or "no interest", I first have to, let's say, relax in that situation, so that I can place my next step, meaning the question I'm going to ask, well. With the right tone and of course also with the right choice of words.
10:59Franjo: If the other side has used, let's say, particular or specific words, I have to be able to use those words too, so that I show: Okay, I listened to you. So, empathy.
11:11Dominka: Yes. We always talk about separating such reactions from yourself as a person, about somehow letting it bounce off. But maybe "bounce off" isn't the right word, because if it bounces off you, then it's just gone, and you don't want anything more to do with it, right?
11:32Franjo: Exactly, exactly. You have to be able to digest it.
Dominka: Okay, better word.
11:37Franjo: Better word. If you can digest things like that, and you have to practise that too, then it's also easier to practise the right reaction to this situation.
11:52Dominka: So, step one …
Franjo: Digest.
Dominka: Swallow it.
Franjo: And digest.
Dominka: Then digest, and then …
12:00Franjo: Afterwards, spit it out. Exactly, exactly. Out with it.
Dominka: A bit gross.
12:05Franjo: When you put it like that, yes, a bit gross. But yes, that's the whole principle.
12:11Typical "no need" situation: the prospect already has long-standing partners
12:11Dominka: What are typical situations in which "no need" comes up?
12:18Franjo: What I experienced most recently, for example, is that a contact person already has long-standing partners who do the same thing we do, or rather the same thing I'm calling about for the projects. And then they say: "Yes, that's why there's no need." So they told me, with arguments, why there's currently no need. Which I accept, but I don't give up. That means, even though I know that the chance of a meeting or a potential partnership is small, I know: If I can get a foot in the door, I already have an opportunity to do something in the future. Hence: persistence.
13:06Dominka: That's very important. So the "no need" objection really is an objection that must not simply be accepted. Especially if you're someone who does sales for your own company or is outsourced to do it. That's someone who defends the concept of the company's product or service because they also believe it's something good. Otherwise we wouldn't even take the job, right?
Franjo: Right.
13:32Dominka: That's why you always have to keep that in the back of your mind. You have to be motivated. The motivation and simply the will, that helps you to really want to handle an objection and also to get creative, right?
13:51Franjo: Yes, I completely agree with you. Because if you're all fired up about the project, it's much easier to find good arguments. And if you're even in a tight spot, you can, through creativity, as you put it so nicely, find a good way, at least for data mining.
14:16Franjo: That also makes sense.
Dominka: That makes total sense. We make total sense, the two of us, yes. What we're saying here is …
Franjo: Please take note.
Dominka: … very sensible.
14:27Franjo: For everyone listening: please take note and write it down. Thank you. Just use it on your next cold calls and then write in the comments how it all worked. Thank you.
14:38Dominka: Yes, motivated, but always.
Franjo: Always motivated.
Dominka: Now pay attention.
Franjo: I'm paying attention.
14:46Tone and wording: calm, relaxed, a little confused
14:46Dominka: The role of timing and tone. … Hello?
Franjo: Yes, especially important.
Dominka: Hello?
Franjo: Very especially important.
Dominka: Hello?
Franjo: Yes, I'm listening to you.
14:59Dominka: Yes, what exactly do you say about it? So the importance of the voice, the speed, the choice of words, you already mentioned that, arguments, target group, industry.
15:11Franjo: You always have to be able to adapt to the contact person. Because if you ask the right question with the right tone and the right choice of words, it's easier to get the reaction you want. Meaning the other person opens up and can talk about, let's say, problems, bad experiences and so on. If, for example, I come in with the wrong tone and start, what was I going to say, shouting at the other person, then I get nothing out of it. But that's of course the worst thing I can do. Relaxed, calm and then even a bit confused. That can also be a good strategy for success, if you say in a confused tone: "I couldn't understand your arguments, could you please explain that again in more detail?" Then I can get the right pain points out quite well.
16:12Timing on a micro and a macro level: person, industry, market
16:12Dominka: And in terms of timing: It's not only the individual timing of the person you want to reach. Of course that's the most important thing. If you've got the info that he's not in today, then of course you don't call ten times to reach him after all. Or if he's in meetings all the time, then you're not someone who makes phone calls during the meeting either. You go by this person.
16:36Dominka: That's micro timing, I'd say. So placing yourself: Okay, then he's reachable, then he's in the office, then I know when I can reach him. But there's also timing on a macro level, if I may call it that. Global. We don't live in a capsule, we're not sealed off from the world. You can find out a lot around the whole topic. If you're perhaps calling an industry where you know very well they're not ready for things like this at the moment, because maybe there are huge trade fairs right now.
Franjo: True.
17:17Dominka: Or maybe you simply know from the news, globally, or from LinkedIn or from somewhere you look in a bit, that the market there is completely saturated right now, that the market is in a crisis. Those are things you can find out very easily. There are things you can find out all around, and then you have to know clearly: Okay, if he says "no need" now, then I know he means it. But I called anyway and introduced myself, and I'm a really nice guy. And I'll call again in six months if things go well. With my tone, with my manner, with my friendly attitude, I've already opened the door for myself.
18:04Franjo: True. And I completely agree that precisely in situations like that, where you can very easily find out important information, you can also show understanding towards the contact person. And they really appreciate it if I'm not pushy, but really human, which is what matters most in the sales industry.
18:26Dominka: And that's the approach you should take with objections like these above all, when you get them in situations like that. But it doesn't mean that if you already know there's probably nothing going on there, you shouldn't call, just with a different sentiment.
18:43Franjo: Exactly. The sentiment would then be: I'm getting a foot in the door. I'm showing who we are, what the company does, what we're planning in general. And if it doesn't work out at the moment, okay. Maybe in the future they'll have the resources, the time, the will to develop it further.
19:04Insolvent, and six months later new investors
19:04Dominka: What's always a bit awkward: when you call a company and don't know that it has gone insolvent.
Franjo: I've experienced that several times.
19:11Dominka: Yes, that's a bit awkward. You could actually find that out, but maybe you don't take that step right away. Sometimes you forget to do it, right?
19:19Franjo: I had a case like that at the beginning of this year, exactly. I called the company in the middle of last year, very, very nice contact person. He said: "Yes, unfortunately we're insolvent. Call us again in six months, then we'll see whether we can do something." I thought to myself: Ugh, calling again now, how much sense does that make? Does it make any sense at all? I got the same contact person again, and he said: "Yes, we've found new investors, and we're ready for new projects."
Dominka: See?
Franjo: It worked.
Dominka: Timing.
Franjo: Timing is very important.
19:59The biggest mistake: switching off emotionally right away
19:59Dominka: I'll move on to the third part. We've already talked about it, we've already thrown in a few tips. But what's a common mistake that happens, or that you've come across? Giving up too early, overthinking, being impatient?
20:22Franjo: I'd say the first reaction: that you immediately switch off emotionally and want to end the call as quickly as possible. That's the biggest mistake you can make. Because at that moment you've simply thrown away all the possibilities. Despite the, let's say, great stress you experience when someone says "no need", especially when the other person is angry, you have to find the strength to ask the right question. I'll give an example now: "If you already have it or want to implement it, can you explain in more detail why there's no need?" And then you at least show commitment, for data mining, and also, let's say, respect towards the other person. Because I want to understand why there's no need or no interest. Not just accept it flatly like that.
21:21The same reason again and again: teamwork, not a solo effort
21:21Dominka: What helps when you really know: Okay, I've now very often had the objection "no need", "no interest". Maybe I'm also very often getting the same or a similar reason. Does it help to try something new, new scripts, to switch?
21:46Franjo: Of course. But then you really have to bring in the whole team.
Dominka: Teamwork.
21:52Franjo: Exactly. The project manager, the partner you're working for, the Quality Manager and also the colleagues who work with me, simply ask: "Have you had experience in this industry and with this problem? What did you do then?" And simply try the options: other scripts, let's say, a different choice of words or a different approach, or in the end even a completely different industry, to get the best possible result for the project. So in situations like that, where you've really heard "no need" several times, it's teamwork, so that the project can keep going. Because one person can't do it.
22:36"No need, we already have that": the self-built software
22:36Dominka: Do you sometimes manage, in a conversation like that where the interest is rejected straight away, to change the person's mind by coming in with a success story, maybe from a similar industry, and then pitching again with it?
22:55Franjo: I didn't manage it with a success story. But I once had a conversation, which was also a pretty good conversation, where the contact person said straight away: "No need, we already have that." Then I asked: "What exactly do you have?" He then explained that he'd made it himself, some kind of software. So I said: "Fine, but you know that our software can do the same thing and that we've already had several decades of experience." And then I heard a moment where he stood still and thought to himself: Really? How come? Then we got into a conversation. Then he told the whole story: why he'd done the whole thing that way, what was very annoying for him, what the pain points were, why the whole company had annoyed him and so on. And then I thought: Even though the other side already has a solution and showed no need and no interest right at the start of the conversation, we came to a good conclusion. So once again: the right questions, the right timing and of course also the right emotional reaction.
24:12Dominka: So you really caught him out?
Franjo: Exactly.
Dominka: Yes, that's good when that happens.
Franjo: I learned from the best.
24:21Following up with case studies from the same industry
24:21Dominka: I also always find, when you manage to really recognise in the conversation: Oh yes, we can actually help there. You've now said "no need", but with a question we still got to the why. Then maybe you take another look: Ah yes, look, for a company like that I actually do this. We actually have a case study from this story. I find that has always worked when you somehow slip that in and try to tell them: "Hey, we somehow managed to change their minds too." Or: "We're doing the same thing for a client like that" or "we've done the same thing".
25:00Franjo: Yes, that helps especially well if you already have experience in this area. Then you also show professionalism. As I said, you really have to have the right industry and already the right experience to have a case study like that. But if you have one, you can easily have deeper conversations and also set up better meetings. So a very, very good point.
25:30Mindset and rituals: taking the frustration to the gym
25:30Dominka: One thing you really cultivate and that, I think, you always pass on as a tip to every man and of course every woman: keeping a clear mindset. And maybe also coming up with a few rituals for yourself. Is there anything you'd like to share again?
25:53Franjo: The only thing I'd say: I know how frustrating it is when you get cut off twenty times a day, hear "no need", "no interest" and so on. Taking that frustration with you, going to the gym and having the best possible gym session, that's for example one option I practise. But you mustn't allow what you hear in conversations to have an influence on you. That's the hard part. Because if you really hear "no need" 20, 30 times a day, you really lose the desire for the project, for …
26:38Dominka: … doing anything. But I think it's also your own fault if you hear that 20 times a day. That can't be right.
26:44Franjo: Among other things, too. Of course I exaggerated it a bit now, so to speak. But if you hear it several times, it can also be the salesperson's fault. Yes, that's true, I completely agree. But it's also your fault if you take it to heart and don't have a good way of digesting the whole thing in the end. So: If you do something to let out all the anger, all the frustration, so that next time you can do it again in a better mood, with full fire, I think that's a good strategy.
27:29Research after the call: follow your gut
27:29Dominka: I'm the kind of person who, when there's been an objection or the interest wasn't there and I really had no proper reason, or the person still left me with the impression that they hadn't told me everything …
Franjo: There's something more, right?
27:54Dominka: … then I like to do some research again after an appointment like that or after a conversation. Who are these people? Maybe I missed something. I think that's not a bad ritual: not just calling again tomorrow, but maybe calming down first and seeing: Okay, no, I did everything right. All okay, everything fits. But if you find something out and see: Ah okay, maybe I can do something there after all. Maybe I'll send an email afterwards. Maybe I'll call again tomorrow anyway. Maybe I'll make sure that at the next appointment with them, if there is a next appointment, I have a new piece of information for them that could make them happy, because I found out something somewhere. You don't have to do it every time, but I think when you've got that feeling that there could be something more …
Franjo: Then you should do it.
28:46Dominka: Are you allowed to shout something …
Franjo: Yes, of course.
Dominka: … after them?
28:51Franjo: Not shout, but then you really have to watch your tone, depending on how the conversation ended. Then you can really achieve good success too. But I agree with you there: Sometimes you really have to follow your gut feeling.
29:11Game time: pitching "no interest" as a product
29:11Dominka: Franjo, I have a game, it was prepared for us. Thank you, Kim, as always. The game is called: "Pitch the objection. Sell the no." The tables are turned. The guest has to sell the objection himself, as if it were a valuable product or a service. You have to sell "no interest" as if it were the best thing that can happen to a company. Well, sometimes it actually is.
Franjo: Sometimes it is, yes.
29:45Dominka: Why should you have no interest? What does it get you? What's the USP?
Franjo: All right.
29:51Dominka: Good. I'll give you two objections: "no need" or "no interest". Task: pitch the objection as a product or service within 30 seconds. Bonus points for buzzwords, exaggerated marketing, absurd features or benefits.
30:14Franjo: All right. You tell me when I can start.
Dominka: I'm saying now: no interest.
Franjo: Okay, and I can start.
30:20Dominka: And you have to pitch the objection to me now. I've chosen "no interest". Is that how it works? Good. I'm deciding that I need no interest. But I don't know why.
30:33Franjo: All right. The first question that of course has to be asked here is: How many annoying salespeople called you today? Surely a lot. And many of them said: "Yes, we have lots of good products, we have lots of good options." But nobody really showed empathy, nobody really showed, let's say, good research. They were just annoying. "I have the best possible solution for you."
31:02Dominka: I said yes to all of them. Now I've spent tens of thousands of euros on products I don't need.
Franjo: That was too early. You should have said "no interest".
Dominka: If only I'd known that sooner.
31:16Franjo: With "no interest" you can also switch off the most annoying salesperson, just cut them off. That works like a charm. Someone who has an incredibly good pitch: "No interest", and just hang up. Best combination here.
31:31Dominka: But what if I say "no interest" and he says: "But I still have a free …"
Franjo: Hang up.
Dominka: "… eraser here."
31:38Franjo: Best combination there is.
Dominka: Hang up straight away?
31:44Franjo: Exactly. Then the salesperson has no chance to add any further points.
31:51Dominka: But what if he calls back straight away?
31:52Franjo: If he calls again, once more: "Good day, no interest." Click, done.
Dominka: And if he calls again?
Franjo: No interest.
Dominka: As long as he calls …
32:01Franjo: As long as he calls, always the same thing. It's very simple, very clear: two words you can always use.
32:10Dominka: Oh, I see, I don't know whether I should use "no interest". Maybe then I'll miss out on something super great.
32:17Franjo: You see, that's the beauty of it. "No interest" also shows the quality of the salesperson. Even if he's annoying: If he's intelligent, he'll also show other ways of getting the right information across to you.
32:32Dominka: Yes, but I'm just unstable, so I can't tell what's good for me and what isn't good for me.
32:39Franjo: That shows the crème de la crème, as opposed to the boring salesperson. That's the difference. If you use "no interest" there, it automatically filters out which salespeople are the good ones and which are the bad ones.
Dominka: Okay. And so only the good one gets through to me.
Franjo: Exactly.
Dominka: If he stays persistent.
32:56Franjo: Exactly, and if he's intelligent, if he also uses other ways to give you the information. So "no interest" is not just the best brush-off, but also a filter for the future. Then you know: Only the one who understands that "no interest" doesn't mean no, but is a way to show other possibilities … then you also get the right solution.
33:19Dominka: Good. And what does a "no interest" like that cost?
Franjo: Nothing.
Dominka: Free?
Franjo: Free, free. Anyone can say "no interest". Thank you.
33:29Dominka: Very nice. Super. That's it. Not bad. Thank you. It was also a bit absurd.
Franjo: A bit philosophical.
Dominka: A bit Brecht, very Brecht-like.
Franjo: Yes, a bit epic. Brecht's theatre (Bertolt Brecht's "epic theatre"). And dramatic.
33:48Bottom line: similar, but not the same
33:48Dominka: No interest, no need: similar, but not the same.
Franjo: Exactly.
33:54Dominka: Mindset is very important. Maybe always have a ritual for yourself after you've heard something bad and aren't happy with it: take another look, what can I do better? Don't take it to heart, but still think about it. Don't just let it bounce off, but rather digest it: swallow it and then get it out again.
Franjo: Exactly, now you've got it.
34:14Dominka: Very nice. That's it. That was our 15th episode, our second episode in the objections series. We'll keep going with it. I hope there are still a few more we can discuss nicely.
34:26Dominka: To the audience once more: Thanks for listening. Tune in again next Monday, then we'll have a new topic for you. Subscribe to our channel. You can find Franjo on LinkedIn, you can find me on LinkedIn. Follow us. And keep it up with the cold calling.
Franjo: And show interest.
34:50Dominka: And if you've never done cold calling, give it a try. And if you don't manage it, if it just doesn't work out for you …
Franjo: Just ask.
Dominka: There's us. Bye, Franjo. Thank you.
Franjo: Bye.
Related episodes
DEB2B Cold Calling Year in Review: Why "No Budget" Was Everywhere in 2025
Episode 43 of Dialing Out. At the end of the year, Dominka looks back on 2025 with Marijana Botica, BDR at OB2B: no KPI talk, just real lessons from everyday BDR work. The toughest objection of the year was "no budget", often also as "Get back to us next year".
DEB2B Sales Objections: Enemy or Your Friend?
Episode 40 of the Dialing Out series. Dominka talks to Franjo Papec, BDR at OB2B and, in Dominka's words, "the company's crowned objection master", about whether objections in B2B sales are an enemy or a friend.
DEStubborn Decision-Makers in Cold Calling: 4 Types & How to Win Them Over
In this episode of Dialing Out, Dominka Babić talks with Valentina Budačić, Account Executive at OB2B, about stubborn contacts in cold calling. Dominka has brought four typical profiles: the know-it-all, the ghoster, the chronic objector and the gatekeeper.